Head rackets
Published: 30 Jul 2007 - 02:06 by hothead
Updated: 24 Sep 2008 - 16:32
Subscribers: Log in to subscribe to this post.
After 3 months I have broken my Head Flexpoint 130. I had banged it on the wall with full force so most probably fault lies with me. But My Liquid metal 150 also broke down in 3-4 months. Whereas a Prince TT viper has served me for about an year now.
A few other players had also mentioned that head rackets are more prone to breakage. Is it true? What are your views?
Replies...
Please Note: The most recent replies are now at the top!
From nickhitter - 01 Aug 2007 - 07:47
From Daren - 31 Jul 2007 - 19:03
I agree, Heads are a nice racquet but they break too easily.
Karakal is tough.
I'm keen to try a Dunlop, been playing with an old hire racquet Dunlop and loving it. I wonder how tough the new ones are.
From mike - 30 Jul 2007 - 09:53
I have an old Ti Powerzone 170 which has lasted very well, but I've broken both a Flexpoint 150 and a Metallix 130 with minor and moderate wall impacts respectively.
In both cases the raquets cracked at the top "corner". They were still playable, but once the strings break they cannot be restrung.
I'm trying a Karakal one now, on recommendation from a pro shop and so far so good. Only had it for a month though.
From rippa rit - 30 Jul 2007 - 08:22
Put in a search "Head rackets" and you will get several replies on the Head range etc.
Also, after that, go to the Gear Forum and have a squiz.
If you then have a question or an answer tell us about it.
Sorry, only members can post replies on this and all other Members` Forum items.
Support Squashgame
Support us here at Squashgame.info! If you think we helped you, please consider our Squash Shop when purchasing or make a small contribution.
Back to top